Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gerow v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Perrong v. Home Team Investors LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01169
Plaintiff:
Andrew R Perrong
Defendant:
Home Team Investors LLC, Brad Mortensen and Rial Clark Richardson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Price v. Maxwell & Morgan PC et al
as 2:2016cv04375
Plaintiff:
Dana D Price, III
Defendant:
Maxwell & Morgan PC, Samuel C Richardson and Unknown Richardson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jason v. Maxwell & Morgan PC et al
as 2:2016cv02894
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jason
Defendant:
Maxwell & Morgan PC, Samuel C Richardson and Unknown Richardson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Planned Parenthood Arizona Incorporated et al v. Humble
as 4:2014cv01910
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Arizona Incorporated , William Richardson and William H Richardson
Defendant:
William Humble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Wade et al
as 2:2011cv02233
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Robert L Wade, Jr., Andrew Richardson, Clinton Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
