Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ramirez et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv01850
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramirez and Ricky Hernandez
Defendant:
J. B. Pritzker, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramirez and Ricky Hernandez
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Director IDOC and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv11186
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hernandez
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, City Of Chicago, State Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Wall Street Gold Buyers Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv04695
Defendant:
Rahamin Abramov and Wall Street Gold Buyers Corp.
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hernandez v. Wall Street Gold Buyers Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv02844
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hernandez
Defendant:
Wall Street Gold Buyers Corp. and Rahamin Abramov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Leonardo Jimenez-Ariza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72858
Petitioner:
LEONARDO JIMENEZ-ARIZA, AKA Ricky Hernandez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Leonardo Jimenez-Ariza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70613
Petitioner:
LEONARDO JIMENEZ-ARIZA, AKA Ricky Hernandez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ricky Hernandez v. Donald Gaetz
as 09-1550
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and DONALD GAETZ
Green v. Dixon et al
as 5:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dave Green
Defendant:
Kerry Dixon, Hugh Bryan, Larry Bond and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hernandez v. Hulick et al
as 1:2007cv00848
Petitioner:
Ricky Hernandez
Respondent:
Donald Hulick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
