Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Amy I Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv13842
Plaintiff:
Carolina Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Claudio-Rivera, Daniel v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Claudio-Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Camerin Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv06865
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rivera
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dorelis Rivera
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bruno Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00405
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rafael Bruno Rivera
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Rivera, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera v. Saul
as 1:2019cv07419
Plaintiff:
Viviana Rivera
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rivera-Capeles v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv01286
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Laura Rivera-Capeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
