Cases 1 - 10 of 52
ROB et al v. HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
ABDUR ROB and ROB BEVERAGE III, LLC
Defendant:
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Benjamin Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 23-5188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benjamin Woodhouse, Mr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike Inc. and others
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
WOODHOUSE v. META PLATFORMS INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01924
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS INC., ALPHABET INC., NIKE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Karl Masek v. Rob Isonta, et al
as 22-5257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Karl Ray Masek
Defendant / Appellee:
Rob Isonta, Attorney General, Carmel Mountain Post Office, Laguna Beach Post Office and others
LASSITER v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02567
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
TODD YOUNG, JOHN BARRASSO, MARSH BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
BOLIN v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv02311
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ROB BONTA and RACHAEL NEWCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDINA v. BONTA
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
OMAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA
Defendant:
ROB BONTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
KARIMI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
REZAEIKHONAKDAR BARDIA, MORTEZA KARIMI, MARYAM FARIDZADEH and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, IAN BROWNLEE, ROB SILBERSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01517
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
