Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PERRY et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv00548
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, JOE BIDEN and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAHR et al v. HERITAGE FOUNDATION et al
as 1:2019cv02675
Defendant:
HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ROB BLUEY and KAY COLE JAMES
Plaintiff:
EVAN GAHR and WASHINGTON GADFLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRETT v. SAMSON et al
as 1:2017cv01054
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
DAVID SAMSON, BILL NAULTY, JAIMIE FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WADE v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
E K WADE
Defendant:
JEFF MILLER, GARY ACKERMAN, SANDY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Jones v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 10-7124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Bobby Jindal, Governor, State of Louisiana, Sue P. Everhart, Republican Party of Louisiana and others
JONES v. JINDAL et al
as 1:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
BOBBY JINDAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, SUE P. EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2010cv00666
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WEST
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, JEFFREY ATKINS, WILLIAM SUTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LIBERTARIAN PARTY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS et al
as 1:2009cv01676
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY, BOB BARR, J. BRADLEY JANSEN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
