Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Del Muro-Guerrero v. Villasenor et al
as 3:2008cv01712
Plaintiff:
Alberto Jose Del Muro-Guerrero
Defendant:
J. Villasenor, Paula M Jarnecke, Robert E McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leigh-Davis Glass v. Robert E McFadden et al
as 8:2008cv00566
Petitioner:
Leigh-Davis Glass
Respondent:
Robert E McFadden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tereser A Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Glass v. McFadden et al
as 3:2008cv01585
Petitioner:
Leigh-Davis Glass
Respondent:
Robert E. McFadden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tereser A. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Timmons v. Ives, et al
as 2:2008cv00422
Petitioner:
Marcus Christopher Timmons
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives, Robert E. McFadden, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Castro v. McFadden
as 3:2007cv05775
Petitioner:
Hernan O'Ryan Castro
Respondent:
Robert E. McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Timothy Edward Holz v. Robert E McFadden
as 5:2007cv01410
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Robert E McFadden, J L Norwood, Hodak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Deboo et al
as 2:2007cv02255
Petitioner:
Gregory W. Lee
Respondent:
Kuma J. Deboo, Robert E. McFadden, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Parman v. Gonzaga et al
as 1:2007cv01512
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Parman
Defendant:
Alicia Gonzaga, Dennis Smith, Robert E. McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Buonocore v. Daboo et al
as 2:2007cv01164
Petitioner:
Tony M. Buonocore
Respondent:
Kuma J. Daboo, R - Young, Robert E. McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
