Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Friedman v. The Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
The Real Estate Board of New York, Inc., Douglas Elliman Inc., Christies International Real Estate LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Friedman v. Real Estate Board of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09601
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Real Estate Board of New York, Douglas Elliman, Inc., Christies International Real Estate LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Friedman v. Winslow et al
as 1:2023cv04324
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Lance Winslow, Joanne Abrams and Coney Island Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friedman v. Hofstra University et al
as 1:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Hofstra University, Dr. Mark Lerner and Public Safety of Hofstra University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friedman v. Noribar
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Noribar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friedman v. Mendy's Restaurant
as 1:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Mendy's Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friedman v. Eshel Hotel
as 1:2022cv00980
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Eshel Hotel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friedman v. Friedman et al
as 1:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Friedman
Defendant:
Morris Friedman, Phyliss Friedman and Self Help Community Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
