Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Curtis Hawkins v. Robert Hernandez
as 10-55818
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS CAMERON HAWKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden
Pittman v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2010cv01085
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
A Sanchez, Robert Hernandez, . and Jary Sandor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Espino et al
as 3:2010cv00908
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Espino, V Aguirrie, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Attorney General, V Aguirrie and Robert Hernandez, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. The Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00628
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
The Attorney General, Robert Hernandez, . and Tome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00617
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Gary Sandor , A Sanchez and Robert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00619
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
G Sandor , D Pearson , Warden's Correction Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00616
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Gary Sandor , A Sanchez and Robert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00624
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
G Sandor , A Sanchez and Robert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Aguirrie et al
as 3:2010cv00627
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
V Aguirrie, Robert Hernandez, . and The Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
