Cases 1 - 10 of 16
GRIBSCHAW v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRIBSCHAW
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGUSON, ANN VERYYALA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRONG v. SELLTEL INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Defendant:
DAVID CARY GARTENBERG, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, SELLTEL INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
THAXTER v. MARTIN
as 2:2018cv02305
Plaintiff:
LATONYA THAXTER
Defendant:
ROBERT MARTIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRINK-HAMLETT v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv02398
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE FRINK-HAMLETT
Defendant:
THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and ROBERT MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEST et al v. C.R. ENGLAND, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv04872
Plaintiff:
KATIE WEST , ROBERT MARTIN and KATHLEEN MARTIN
Defendant:
C.R. ENGLAND, INC. , MAWUYRAYRASSUNA NOVIHO and GREGORY GUERRIER
Counter_claimant:
MAWUYRAYRASSUNA NOVIHO , C.R. ENGLAND, INC. and GREGORY GUERRIER
Counter_defendant:
KATHLEEN MARTIN , ROBERT MARTIN and KATIE WEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv06291
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHARLES MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
MARY J. ANDERS and ROBERT MARTIN FALIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARTIN et al v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2011cv06960
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTIN and PATRICIA MARTIN
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv61431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTIN
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION , INC. ACANDS, CERTAINTEED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33057
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTIN
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
