Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Day v. Social Security Administration et al
as 8:2022cv02096
Plaintiff:
Roy A Day
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, ANDREW M. SAUL, ANDREW M IBISON and others
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182 Defend. Denial of Pla. Appl. Alien Employment Cert
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on denials of applications for naturalization
Riethmiller v. Ezell et al
as 8:2012cv01796
Plaintiff:
AnnaMarie D. Riethmiller
Defendant:
Braxton Ezell, Marc Gilner, Peter Dubensky and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00838
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kirk v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 8:2008cv01661
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Kirk and Michael D. Kirk
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Khalil et al v. Poulos et al
as 3:2008cv00650
Plaintiff:
Samia E. Khalil and Geries Z. Hanania
Defendant:
Christina Poulos and Robert S. Mueller, III
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
