Cases 61 - 70 of 74
YANG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01270
Plaintiff:
ZHIYONG YANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HASHEMI et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01269
Plaintiff:
SEYED HASHEMI and NEDA NIKBAKHT
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUSUMANO v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2007cv00971
Petitioner:
GIUSEPPE CUSUMANO
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALEZ, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, MICHAEL A. CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
GORINA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
MARINA GORINA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
AHMAD v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00487
Plaintiff:
IMRAN AHMAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, CHRISTINA POULOS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NAFFA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00462
Plaintiff:
SUHA AMAL NAFFA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
XU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00420
Plaintiff:
JIYUN XU and JIYUN XU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
