Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Vaidya v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 4:2007cv03785
Petitioner:
Bhushan N. Vaidya
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
VAIDYA v. FBI et al
as 4:2007mc00652
Petitioner:
Bhushan N. Vaidya
Defendant:
FBI, USCIS, USCIS - Houston District Office and others
Liu v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv03541
Plaintiff:
Jun Liu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Sharon Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Satyanarayan v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2007cv03441
Plaintiff:
Ashwin Satyanarayan
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, District Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
O. v. Keisler et al
as 4:2007cv03411
Plaintiff:
Sewon O.
Defendant:
Peter D Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arid v Chertoff
as 4:2007mc00609
Petitioner:
Sami Arid
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Sharon A Hudson and others
Contreras-Castro v. Keisler et al
as 4:2007mc00602
Plaintiff:
Roberto Contreras-Castro
Defendant:
Peter D. Keisler, Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff and others
Rashid v Chertoff
as 4:2007mc00605
Petitioner:
Omar Sharif Rashid
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Sharon A Hudson and others
Sorkhi v Chertoff
as 4:2007mc00597
Petitioner:
Soheila Sorkhi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Sharon A Hudson and others
Qin v. Mueller, et al
as 4:2007cv00433
Petitioner:
Xiaozhen Qin
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III and Emilio T Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
