Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Heard v. 1st Shift Officers et al
as 2:2021mi00010
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Defendant:
1st Shift Officers, 2nd Shift Officers and Inmates
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. 2nd Shift Officers, A3
as 2:2021mi00007
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Defendant:
2nd Shift Officers, A3
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. City of Gainesville et al
as 2:2021mi00006
Defendant:
Asians, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. Ibrahim & RAO, LLP et al
as 2:2021mi00005
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Ibrahim & RAO, LLP
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. Kemp et al
as 2:2021mi00004
Defendant:
D.O.C., Commissioner, Att. Gen. of Ga. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. Hall County Commissioners et al
as 2:2018mi00002
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Defendant:
Hall County Commissioners, Gainesville City Government, Gainesville City Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. Ross et al
as 1:2018mi00029
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Defendant:
Eleanor L. Ross, Richard W. Story and William C. O'Kelly
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. State of Georgia, Attorney General et al
as 1:2018mi00008
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Attorney General and Hall County Magistrate Court Senior Judge
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017mi00093
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard and Antwan K. Jackson
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections and City of Gainesville, GA
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. Deal et al
as 1:2017mi00085
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, City of Gainesville, GA and High School Students
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
