Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant:
TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
Empls Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 21-3993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JONES
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRSTENERGY CORP and FIRSTENERGY CORP.
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Jones et al
as 2:2020cv04813
Defendant:
Charles E Jones, James F O'Neil, III, Steven E. Strah and others
Plaintiff:
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Petitioner:
Massachusetts Laborer Pension Fund Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp
Interested Party:
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Roberta Bloom, James Atherton, Arlene Pogolowitz and others
Consolidated Defendant:
John Does 1-50
Not Classified By Court:
Edward Orr, Todd Augenbaum and John Donovan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Bloom et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv04534
Defendant:
Christopher D Pappas, Charles E Jones, K. Jon Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Roberta Bloom, Arlene Pogolowitz and Joan Randell
Not Classified By Court:
John Donovan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
