Cases 41 - 50 of 358
Melissa Ashby v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02613
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ashby
Defendant:
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. , Roche Laboratories, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melissa Ashby v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-05274
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ashby
Defendant:
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. , Roche Laboratories Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
Melissa Ashby v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05274
Plaintiff:
Dr. Melissa Ashby
Defendant:
Does, Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Rachel Pesota v. Roche Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01526
Plaintiff:
Rachel Pesota
Defendant:
Roche Laboratories, Inc. , Hoffman-LaRoche Inc. , Doe California Pharmaceutical Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rachel Pesota v. Roche Laboratories, Inc. et al
as CAC/8:14-cv-00795
Plaintiff:
Rachel Pesota
Defendant:
Roche Laboratories, Inc. , Hoffman-LaRoche Inc. , Doe California Parmaceutical Companies and others
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA BURGHARDT and PHILLIP BURGHARDT
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
In re: Fosamax
as 14-2635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY S. TOLSTON and GARY T. TOLSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and others
In Re: Fosamax, et al
as 14-2544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA VAUGHN
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HOFFMAN LA ROCHE INC and others
Rachel Pesota v. Roche Laboratories, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-03892
Plaintiff:
Rachel Pesota
Defendant:
Roche Laboratories, Inc. , Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. , Doe California Parmaceutical Companies and others
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA MOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, GENENTECH INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
