Cases 11 - 14 of 14
EBSnet, Inc. v. Wago Corporation et al
as 1:2012mc91257
Movant:
EBSnet, Inc.
Defendant:
Wago Corporation and Wago Kontakttchnik GmbH & Co. KG
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.
Ricker, et al. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., et al.
as 1:2012cv11532
Plaintiff:
Alan E. Ricker and Clara P. Ricker
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Amtrol, Inc. , NSTAR Electric and others
Cross_claimant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Bayer Cropscience. Inc. as successor to AMCHEM, Inc. , Union Carbide Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
A.L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc., A.L. Eastmond Company, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Samara et al v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11136
Plaintiff:
Randolf G. Samara and Janice Samara
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hilbert et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation
as 1:2007cv10205
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation
Plaintiff:
William J. Hilbert, Jr., William J. Hilbert, Jr., Pamela Hilbert and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ArvinMeritor, Inc., Incorrectly sued Herein as Successor in Interest to Rockwell Automation, Inc., f/k/a Rockwell Automation Corporation, ArvinMeritor, Inc., Incorrectly sued Herein as Successor in Interest to Rockwell Automation, Inc., f/k/a Rockwell Automation Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund
Cross Claimant:
The Boeing Company, Boeing North American, Inc., McDonnell Douglas Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
