Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Michael Davis v. Rodney Chandler
as 18-10977
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, Federal Correction Institute-Fort Worth
Michael Davis v. Rodney Chandler, et al
as 17-10916
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, WALLER, Unit Manager, M. J. GUTIERREZ, Unit Manager and others
Arnulfo Davila v. Rodney Chandler
as 16-11495
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARNULFO DAVILA
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Fort Worth
Withberto Velazquez v. Rodney Chandler
as 16-10381
Petitioner - Appellant:
WITHBERTO VELAZQUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Fort Worth
Michael Davis v. Rodney Chandler
as 16-10337
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden
Andres Mares, Jr. v. Rodney Chandler, et al
as 16-10044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRES REYNA MARES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, FCI Fort Worth, TODD WILLIAMSON, Health Services Administrator, FCI Fort Worth, JULIA WOODARD, Occupational Therapist, FCI Fort Worth and others
Mohamed Mohamed v. Rodney Chandler
as 16-10039
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOHAMED M. MOHAMED
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden
Brent Dubois v. Rodney Chandler, Warden
as 15-11149
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRENT MICHAEL DUBOIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rodger Griggs v. Rodney Chandler
as 15-10197
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODGER DALE GRIGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-Fort Worth
Emmanuel Nnaji v. Rodney Chandler
as 14-10834
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMMANUEL NNAJI
Respondent - Appellee:
RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, FCI Fort Worth
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
