Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Burlington Insurance Company, The v. VIP Latino LLC et al
as 6:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
Burlington Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
VIP Latino LLC doing business as VIP Latino Bar and Grill and Martin Tinajero Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Ortega et al
as 9:2023cv03913
Plaintiff:
Ohio Security Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sarai Ortega and Nicholas Andrew Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company v. Rodriguez et al
as 0:2023cv00701
Counter Defendant:
Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kevin Rodriguez, Darwin Lemus and D&E Glass LLC
Counter Claimant:
Jessica Marin Serrato and Javier Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
GEICO Marine Insurance Company v. Lindmark et al
as 8:2022cv02982
Plaintiff:
GEICO Marine Insurance Company
Defendant:
Patrick Lindmark, Stephen Richard Berg, Robert Mahany and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Great American Assurance Company v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv02954
Defendant:
Jaquez Joyner, Lawrence Eugene Squires, III, State of South Carolina, The and others
Plaintiff:
Great American Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Messinger et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2017cv02412
Plaintiff:
John A Messinger and David M Messinger
Defendant:
John C Rodriguez and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
John C Rodriguez
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
David M Messinger and John A Messinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nexity Bank v. Rodriguez
as 7:2009cv02142
Plaintiff:
Nexity Bank and Nexity Bank
Defendant:
Richard A Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
