Cases 41 - 50 of 685
PENA RODRIGUEZ v. RICKY D. DIXON, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2023cv21253
Defendant:
Enrique Pena-Rodriguez and Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Jose G Lozano
Respondent:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Rambosk et al
as 1:2023cv20892
Plaintiff:
Jose G Lozano
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Zinia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Weylin O. Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RODRIGUEZ v. SUMPTER et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KENNETH SUMPTEX, BUENO, LOWERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Irdi Reynardo Mota Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Feliz Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Raymondo Rodriguez and Raymundo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROBINSON v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY L ROBINSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, J SANTIAGO, S INMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHESTNUT v. ROSE et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Defendant:
Amy Rose, JAMES CARTER, LUIS RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
GERNARD D CHESTNUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
