Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Rodriguez v. County of Bernalillo et al
as 1:2014cv00455
Plaintiff:
Ivan Jesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
County of Bernalillo, Dan Houston and Ramon Rustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilkey v. Willard et al
as 1:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Steven Gilkey
Defendant:
David Willard, Michael Martin, Tim Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00753
Plaintiff:
Sergio Javier Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. Chaves County Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv00600
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Jones
Defendant:
Chaves County Detention Center, FNU Corn, FNU Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wishneski v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
Johnathan D. Wishneski
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Luis Moreno , David Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez-Valdez v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00994
Plaintiff:
Martin Edel Rodriguez-Valdez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ordunez v. Lopez
as 2:2012cv00792
Petitioner:
Ernesto Rodriguez Ordunez
Respondent:
James Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Vaughn
as 1:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
Filiberto Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Lee Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00452
Petitioner:
Carlos Francisco Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 1:2009cv00400
Plaintiff:
Mike Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joe R Williams, Michael Heredia, C.M.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
