Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sencial v. Coll et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Steven Sencial
Defendant:
Arthur Coll, A Galvez, S Reina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sanchez-Rodriguez v. Day et al
as 2:2023cv05060
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sanchez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia-Rodriguez v. Ma'at
as 2:2022cv02573
Plaintiff:
Anderson Garcia Rodriguez and Anderson Garcia-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Degante et al v. Markey
as 1:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Luis Degante, Diana Lee Perez, Joselyn Caridad Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Dr Markey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodriguez v. Redding et al
as 1:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant:
Don Redding, Tommy Foster and Crawford Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2020cv03083
Plaintiff:
Carlos A Rodriguez
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. USA et al
as 1:2020cv00936
Defendant:
J Baltazar, E Early, RN Koon and others
Plaintiff:
Adam S Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
