Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Seim (ID 118166) v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2019cv03194
Defendant:
Marilyn Rodriguez and Jamie Nutz
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Seim
Interested Party:
Saline County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn (ID 64377) v. Cline et al
as 5:2019cv03003
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Sherri Price, Tyler Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godfrey (ID 115774) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2019cv03001
Defendant:
Misti Keolavone, (fnu) Schroeder, (fnu) Slaton and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance D. Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery (ID 100308) v. Martin et al
as 5:2015cv03011
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Jeffery
Defendant:
Tammy Martin, Jarred Watson, Rudy Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Carreras v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2011cv03008
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Rodriguez-Carreras
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, (fnu) Pitts, B. Goodenough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. USP Leavenworth et al
as 5:2010cv03179
Plaintiff:
Frank Rodriguez
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth, C. Chester, J. Loftness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. McBryde et al
as 5:2010cv03068
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Bill McBryde and Mary Bloomer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Walters et al
as 5:2009cv03263
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Myers
Defendant:
(fnu) Walters, (fnu) Dyson, Frie Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
