Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Prendi v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01028
Plaintiff:
Rubin Prendi
Defendant:
City of New York , The New York City Police Department , Port Authority of New York & New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. Roe
as 7:2017cv06029
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Roe
as 2:2017cv02911
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
In Re Motion for Civil Contemp
as 16-2935
Respondent:
Richard Roe, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP and Jody Kriss
Respondent - Appellant:
Richard E. Lerner
Appellant:
Frederick Martin Oberlander
Appellee:
John Doe
Intervenor:
Associated Press
Lavy et al v. Wederburn et al
as 1:2016cv04096
Plaintiff:
Yaniv Lavy and Feiner & Lavy, PC
Defendant:
Marc Wederburn, Idir Bournane, Gabriela B. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case - Other
Colon v. Spartan Race, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02611
Defendant:
ABC Companies 1-5, ABC Corporation 1-10, #1-10 JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Amparo Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barraza vs New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et, al
as 7:2015cv08403
Plaintiff:
Alicia Barraza
Defendant:
Joseph Bellnier, New York State Office of Mental Health, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rumsey v. Ossentjuk et al
as 1:2015cv07472
Plaintiff:
Devon Rumsey
Defendant:
Walter J Ossentjuk and Roe Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lavy v. Wederburn et al
as 1:2015cv03778
Plaintiff:
Yaniv Lavy
Defendant:
Marc Wederburn, John Doe 1-10 and Roes 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel J. Collins v. Brian W. Roe, et al.
as 1:2015cv00411
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Collins
Defendant:
Brian W. Roe , Jacquelyn Gentile , The Altamont Program, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
