Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hale et al v. Court Clerk et al
as 4:2010cv00501
Plaintiff:
Tom Hale, Does 1-10 and Roes 1-10
Defendant:
Court Clerk, Does 1-10 and Roes 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chace v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Raymond N Chace, Jr
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Does and Roes 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chace v. First Horizon Home Loans et al
as 1:2010cv00332
Plaintiff:
Mary Chace
Defendant:
First Horizon Home Loans and Does and Roes 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National City Mortgage et al v. Chace
as 1:2010cv00297
Defendant:
Mary Chace
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage, PNC Mortgage, PNC Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Chace v. National City Mortgage et al
as 1:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Mary Chace
Defendant:
National City Mortgage, PNC Mortgage, PNC Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chace v. M&T Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00413
Plaintiff:
Raymond N Chace, Jr
Defendant:
M&T Mortgage Corporation, M&T Bank, Quality Loan Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Chace v. Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chace
Defendant:
Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Company, C-Loans, Alliance Title & Escrow Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chace v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 1:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Mary Chace
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wells Fargo Bank NA, Greenwich Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chace v. First Horizon Home Loans et al
as 1:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mary Chace
Defendant:
First Horizon Home Loans, First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, Metlife and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
