Cases 1 - 10 of 761
Barnes v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Rogers, Thomas J. Dart and Don Beacham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Groves v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Leslie Groves
Defendant:
Roger Johnson, . Benson, . Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas, Sr. v. Stanback et al
as 1:2023cv14125
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Donte Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
L. Stanback, Dominique McDonald, Richard Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14031
Plaintiff:
Allen Patton
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Susan Shebel, Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv05123
Plaintiff:
DeRay Shaun Huggins
Defendant:
County Of Cook, M Anguiano, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scoby v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv03824
Plaintiff:
Roger M. Scoby
Defendant:
United States, John B. Hadjioannou and 5 Unknown Named Agents of Federal Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rogers v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv03583
Plaintiff:
Udell Rogers
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rogers v. Lowery et al
as 3:2023cv01936
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Renata Lowery and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
Sheriff Jarrod Peters, Officer Ryan Coffee, Officer Jason Juenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
