Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rolf Institute of Structural Integration, The v. Mock
as 1:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
The Rolf Institute of Structural Integration and Rolf Institute of Structural Integration, The
Defendant:
Gary Mock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Bullock v. Rolf's Motorcycle Shop, LLC
as 1:2019cv00808
Plaintiff:
Jerramie Bullock
Defendant:
Rolf's Motorcycle Shop, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rolf v. Lowe's HIW Inc et al.
as 1:2016cv02260
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Lowe's HIW Inc
Plaintiff:
Shannon Rolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer et al v. Walker
as 1:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Antony Spencer and Laurie Bene' Rolfe Spencer
Defendant:
Cody Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houlne et al v. Everts et al
as 1:2014cv03382
Plaintiff:
James Houlne , Melissa Houlne , Rolf Kleeberg and others
Defendant:
Melissa Everts , Francesca Arruzza-O'Brien , Jennifer Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Insurance Deposit Corporation v. Munson, et al
as 1:2012cv02893
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Deposit Corporation
Defendant:
Nicolette N. Munson , Rolf T. Munson and Munson Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00691
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Rolfe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
Varanese E. Rolfe
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everplay Installation Inc. et al v. Guindon
as 1:2008cv00824
Plaintiff:
Everplay Installation Inc. and Rolf Huber
Defendant:
Roger Joseph Guindon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
