Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Romero (ID 127925) v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare et al
as 5:2022cv03235
Plaintiff:
John Ryan Romero
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Gwen Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salgado-Romero v. USA
as 5:2018cv04089
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricardo Salgado-Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Romero (ID 63334) v. Heimgartner
as 5:2014cv03213
Petitioner:
Christopher Edward Romero
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero (ID 63334) v. Heimgartner et al.
as 5:2013cv03189
Petitioner:
Christopher Edward Romero
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero (ID 63334) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03139
Petitioner:
Christopher Edward Romero
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. USA
as 2:2013cv02281
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Miguel Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romero v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2010cv03089
Petitioner:
Jeremy R. Romero
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Eighteenth Judicial District Court and Kenneth Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romero v. Winter et al
as 5:2010cv03023
Petitioner:
Juan C. Romero, Jr.
Respondent:
Kristi Winter, Wichita Police Department and Eighteenth Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Romero v. USA
as 6:2009cv01067
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael Romero
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flores-Romero v. Doe et al
as 5:2007cv03269
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Flores-Romero
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II and (fnu) Star
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
