Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Elliott v. Stevens
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Elliott
Defendant:
Bobbie J. Stevens, Sgt. Bryan Barney, Venrot Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermeal White v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 23-3337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMEAL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN RONALD ERDOS, UNIT MANAGER CHIEF CYNTHIA DAVIS, CORRECTION OFFICERS JOHN DOES, 1-2 and others
Johnson v. ODRC et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Antonio Johnson
Defendant:
ODRC, Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald Erdos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Jordan et al
as 1:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Spencer
Defendant:
Wes Jordan, FNU Adkins, 1 John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
De'Amontae Manning
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Linnea Mahlman, Siney Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dye v. Erdos
as 1:2022cv00848
Petitioner:
Jamal Dye
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00845
Petitioner:
Jamal Dye
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jermeal White v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 22-3350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMEAL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden, CYNTHIA DAVIS, Unit Manager Chief, JUSTIN DEERFIELD and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark AlstonIn re: Mark Alston
as 22-3088
Petitioner:
In re: MARK ALSTON
Respondent:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
