Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Evangelides, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Petitioner:
SoundThinking, Inc.
Williams et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv03773
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs and Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Reyes et al
as 1:2021cv03793
Plaintiff:
Shawn Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Reyes, Jason Brown, Brian Roney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynon v. Perostianis et al
as 1:2017cv08973
Plaintiff:
Eric Lynon
Defendant:
A Perostianis, M Krofta, M Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv07635
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Yiyi, Zong Cai Luo and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Tyrone Roney v. Scott McClintock et al
as 1:2017cv04353
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Roney
Defendant:
Scott McClintock and Village of Forest Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roney v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2011cv12670
Plaintiff:
Becky Roney
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaparro v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv02659
Plaintiff:
Eloisa Chaparro
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Brian Roney, James Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
