Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Rosario v. Hill Roofing Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Rosario
Defendant:
Hill Roofing Company, Inc. and Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
EVANS v. BAILEY, et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
LA'JADE EVANS
Defendant:
MICKEALA BAILEY, JOHN M CIMINILLO, ARMANDA CRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLaughlin v. Florida International University Board of Trustees et al
as 1:2020cv22942
Defendant:
ALEXANDER R ACOSTA, Tawia Baidoe Ansah, Iris Elijah and others
Plaintiff:
Christina McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Puig et al
as 1:2020cv22939
Defendant:
Florida International Board of Trustees (FIU), ALEXANDER R ACOSTA, Tawia Baidoe Ansah and others
Plaintiff:
Christina McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. FIU/Florida International University et al
as 1:2020cv22924
Defendant:
ALEXANDER R ACOSTA, Tawia Baidoe Ansah, Iris Elijah and others
Plaintiff:
Christina McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv22904
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv22629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
