Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiron et al v. Roth et al
as 1:2019cv00541
Plaintiff:
Mariam Jiron
Defendant:
Antoniette Carbajal, Seth Roth, City of Albuquerque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico et al
as 1:2016cv00272
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico , Scott Carroll , John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roth v. Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Inc
as 1:2011cv01023
Plaintiff:
Kaylyn Roth
Defendant:
Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May v. Whitefield et al
as 1:2009cv00763
Plaintiff:
David A May
Defendant:
Elizabeth Whitefield, Beth Roth, M. Diann Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01232
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Monroe v. Assurant Employee Benefits et al
as 1:2007cv00887
Plaintiff:
Michael David Monroe
Defendant:
Assurant Employee Benefits and Kelly Roth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Monroe v. Assurant Employee Benefits et al
as 6:2007cv00887
Plaintiff:
Michael David Monroe
Defendant:
Assurant Employee Benefits and Kelly Roth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brooks v. Roth et al
as 6:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Brooks
Defendant:
Miroslav "Mike" Roth, Cibola County Sheriff's Department, Johnny Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
