Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ignain Perez v. Roto-Rooter Services Company
as 22-56129
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IGNAIN PEREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and all aggrieved employees
Defendant / Appellant:
ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY, an Iowa corporation
Ignain Perez v. Roto Rooter Services Company et al
as 8:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
Ignain Perez
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company, Roto Rooter Services Company and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Williams v. Roto-Rooter Services Company
as 2:2018cv01856
Plaintiff:
Rodney Williams
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company and Roto-Rooter Services Company an Iowa corporation doing business as Roto-Rooter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garrett et al v. Chemed Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01178
Plaintiff:
Justin Shipman, Brad Garrett, Jason Palmer and others
Defendant:
Chemed Corporation, Josephus Morrow, Roto-Rooter Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McGonigle v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 8:2008cv02330
Plaintiff:
John McGonigle
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roland v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 8:2008cv01150
Plaintiff:
Chase Roland
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schubert v. Roto Rooter
as 8:2008cv00395
Plaintiff:
Wayne Schubert
Defendant:
Roto Rooter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Listemann v. Roto Rooter
as 8:2008cv00394
Plaintiff:
Theodore Listemann
Defendant:
Roto Rooter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kruse v. Roto Rooter
as 8:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kruse
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hesson v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 8:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hesson
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
