Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Robertson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01387
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00933
Petitioner:
Royal Clark Robertson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Robertson et al
as 5:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Laticia Robertson, Mrs. Tina Witfield, NFN Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. T.D.C. J. et al
as 1:2020cv00468
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson and Creator Lord God
Defendant:
Bill Clements and T.D.C. J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Employees Bill Clements Unit et al
as 1:2020cv00233
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Lord God Robertson, Creator Lord God Judge Royal C and The State of Texas Robertson C.R.
Defendant:
Employees Bill Clements Unit, Unknowns My Royal Eyes Childrens, Edward Earl Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00235
Petitioner:
Royal Clark Robertson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robertson v. Arnold Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Arnold Texas, NFN Beily and Employees Texas & Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Herrera et al
as 5:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Herrera, Stevens and Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Herrera et al
as 4:2016cv01768
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Herrera, Stevens and Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 2:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles, Amarillo Board Office, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Parole Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
