Cases 1 - 6 of 6
RUSSELL v. BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
LAURA RUSSELL
Defendant:
BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL A JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
RUSSELL v. CHENEVERT
as 2:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
JULIA RUSSELL
Defendant:
PHILLIP AUGUSTUS CHENEVERT, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORIN v. RUSSELL PARK REHAB & LIVING et al
as 2:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
GERALD E MORIN
Defendant:
RUSSELL PARK REHAB & LIVING and CLOVER MANOR NURSING HOME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSSELL v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00173
Plaintiff:
LOIS E RUSSELL
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, CLIFTON ASSOCIATES INC, P S THORSEN COMPANY OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cross_claimant:
CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION , BUDD COMPANY and RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX CORPORATION, WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Counter_claimant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX CORPORATION, WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RUSSELL v. WAL MART STORES INC
as 2:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
SHARON RUSSELL
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC and CLH AND SONS INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
CLH AND SON INC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
WAL MART STORES INC
Counter_claimant:
CLH AND SON INC
Counter_defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cross_claimant:
CLH AND SONS INC
Cross_defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
