Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Russell v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Jacob Russell
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Encinias v. SBBnet, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03191
Plaintiff:
Harold Encinias
Defendant:
Russell Straub and SBBnet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Hatle
as 1:2019cv02359
Defendant:
Russell Hatle
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Strong v. Weld County, Colorado et al
as 1:2013cv03501
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Strong
Defendant:
Weld County, Colorado , Bruce Barker and Patricia Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Erickson v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv00394
Plaintiff:
Russell Erickson
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Axcera Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company et al v. Schucker
as 1:2010cv02062
Plaintiff:
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company , Ellora Energy, Inc. and CIGNA Healthcare of Colorado, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy Russell Schucker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McKeehan v. Verizon Business Health and Welfar Plan et al
as 1:2009cv00471
Plaintiff:
Russel McKeehan
Defendant:
Verizon Business Health and Welfar Plan and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers et al v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2007cv00541
Plaintiff:
Nick Rogers, Nick Rogers, Nick Rogers and others
Defendant:
City and County of Denver and City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rogers et al v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2007cv00466
Plaintiff:
Nick Rogers, Nick Rogers, Nick Rogers and others
Defendant:
City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
