Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Wilson v. Herron et al
as 2:2026cv02469
Defendant:
Sergeant R. Watson, Superintendent Ryan Legore, Stm Lieutenant L. Legore and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Raymond Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. LeGore et al
as 2:2026cv02234
Plaintiff:
Sage Bruce Butler
Defendant:
Ryan LeGore, Bobby Rabb, Lee Lee LeGore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. LeGore
as 2:2026cv01912
Petitioner:
Jesus R. Soto
Respondent:
Ryan LeGore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Herron et al
as 2:2026cv01692
Plaintiff:
Steven Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Captain Dustin Herron, Superintendent Ryan Legore, Jamie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Moore et al
as 2:2026cv01693
Plaintiff:
Steven Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Sergeant L. Moore and Superintendent Ryan Legore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. McNeeley et al
as 2:2026cv01691
Plaintiff:
Steven Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
D. McNeeley, Superintendent Ryan Legore and Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.D., et al. v. Reese, et al.
as 26-4872
Plaintiff:
S.D., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and J.F.
Defendant:
MIKE REESE, RYAN LEGORE, JOHN DOES, 1-5 and others
Hornsby v. LeGore et al
as 2:2026cv01512
Plaintiff:
Glen Alen Hornsby
Defendant:
Ryan LeGore, C. Juarez-Ramirez and E. Ingersol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochell v. LeGore
as 2:2026cv01029
Petitioner:
Wade Anthony Cochell
Respondent:
Ryan LeGore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. LeGore, et al.
as 26-3010
Plaintiff:
CRUZ PALACIOS ROMERO
Defendant:
RYAN LEGORE, Superintendent, PATRICK MANEY, Provedor, THOMAS BRISTOL, Provedor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
