Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Burnett v. Beard et al
as 2:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
Ester Burnett
Defendant:
J. Beard, F. Foulk, S. Peery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adler v. McDonald et al
as 1:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
Brent Adler
Defendant:
M. D. McDonald, R.L. Gower, D. Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adler v. McDonald et al
as 2:2015cv00789
Plaintiff:
Brent Adler
Defendant:
M. D. McDonald, R.L. Gower, D. Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Beard et al
as 2:2014cv01303
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
J. Beard , F. Foulk , S. Peery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Beard et al
as 2:2014at00686
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
J. Beard , F. Foulk , S. Peery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Weston et al
as 2:2013cv01469
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watts
Defendant:
W. Weston, Cobbs, - Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Alexander, et al v. Pom Wonderful LLC, et al
as 12-80192
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOHN ALEXANDER, MELISSA ESPINOZA, JESSICA HOLTER and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
POM WONDERFUL LLC, a Delaware liability company, ROLL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Successor Roll Global LLC, STEWART RESNICK and others
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD A. RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Michael Cox v. J. Plamer, et al
as 11-15389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVE COX, AKA Steve Michael Cox
Defendant - Appellee:
J. PLAMER, R. LEGRAND, M. HENRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
