Cases 1 - 10 of 27
GROSS v. CHAMPION et al
as 3:2023cv24712
Plaintiff:
TAYANA GROSS
Defendant:
S-L SNACKS LOGISTICS LLC and HOWARD CHAMPION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ADAMS v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2022cv81990
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE ADAMS
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U S L L C, Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stajkowski v. GlaxoSmith Kline, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv24374
Plaintiff:
Jose Stajkowski
Defendant:
GlaxoSmith Kline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline P L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Coleman v. Coleman et al
as 9:2021cv81373
Plaintiff:
Della Coleman
Defendant:
Kevin Coleman, GlaxoSmithCline, LLC., GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akers v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv81160
Plaintiff:
Wesley Akers
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Sanofi SA, Boehringer Ingleheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON et al v. KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
as 3:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
CARLY BLACKWELL, GRANT LOPEZ, BREANNA THOMAS and others
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv25190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Thomas v. Rettig et al
as 8:2019cv02813
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Jane Does, Cheryl Cordero and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Diamond Foods, LLC
as 9:2018cv81338
Defendant:
Snyder's-Lance, Inc., Diamond Foods, LLC and S-L Snacks National, LLC
Plaintiff:
Denise Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
