Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Federal Insurance Company v. Apex Maritime Company (LAX), Inc
as 3:2021cv07101
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Gilbert Martin Woodworking Company, Federal Insurance Company and Gilbert Martin Woodworking Company
Defendant:
Apex Maritime Company (LAX), Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Gilbert Martin Woodworking Company v. Apex Maritime Company (LAX), Inc
as 3:2021cv07066
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Gilbert Martin Woodworking Company
Defendant:
Apex Maritime Company (LAX), Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Federal Insurance Company v. United Cargo Management, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv08375
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Point Blank Enterprises, Inc and Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
United Cargo Management, Inc, Pacific International Lines (PTE) Ltd and Pacific International Lines PTE Ltd
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. USA Shipping, LLC, et al
as 3:2019cv03529
Defendant:
USA SHIPPING, LLC, HAPAG LLOYD (AMERICA), INC. and HAPAG LLOYD AG
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA a/s/o WEST LIBERTY FOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Zurich American Insurance Company a/s/o INNOValues Precision (Thailand) Ltd. v. OOCL (USA) Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01285
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company a/s/o INNOValues Precision (Thailand) Ltd.
Defendant:
OOCL (USA) Inc., Orient Overseas Container Line and CSI International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al v. Kintetsu World Express (Taiwan), Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01782
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company and a/s/o Nidec-Shimpo America Corporation
Defendant:
Kintetsu World Express (Taiwan), Inc, King Well Express, Inc, NMC Logistics International Co, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
