Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Herman Surles Sr. et al v. St. Jude Medical Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01455
Defendant:
Does, Pacesetter Inc, St. Jude Medical Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Surles and Herman Surles, Jr
Robert Loiseau et al v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01391
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Pacesetter, Inc., St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Loiseau and Robert Loiseau
St. Jude Medical S.C. Inc et al v. Biosense Webster Inc
as 2:2014cv01326
Defendant:
Biosense Webster Inc
Plaintiff:
Sarah Elsener and St. Jude Medical S.C. Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sicre Yepiz Celaya y Asociados S.C. v. YouTube, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Sicre Yepiz Celaya y Asociados S.C.
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC, Raul Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Barapind v Government of the Republic of India, et al
as 1:2013cv00667
Plaintiff:
Kulvir Singh Barapind
Defendant:
Government of the Republic of India, The State Government of Pubjab, The Punjab Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Sicre Yepiz Celaya y Asociados S.C. v. YouTube, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04295
Plaintiff:
Sicre Yepiz Celaya y Asociados S.C.
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC and Hector Manuel Galindo Alcares
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Timur Mohamed v. Chicago Title Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012mc00295
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company and Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren S.C.
Plaintiff:
Timur Mohamed
Bernhoft Law Firm, S.C. v. Pollock
as 3:2012cv01608
Plaintiff:
Bernhoft Law Firm, S.C.
Defendant:
Blaine Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
AWMS I v. S.C. Blue Air Transport Aerian S.A. et al
as 2:2012cv05255
Plaintiff:
AWMS I
Defendant:
S.C. Blue Air Transport Aerian S.A. and S.C. Romstrade S.R.L.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
