Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Lewis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lewis
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Sammy Sanders and Carolyn Sanders
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell et al v. BrandSafway Services et al
as 2:2023cv03521
Plaintiff:
David Campbell and Ruth Campbell
Defendant:
BrandSafway Services, BrandSafway Services, LLC, FirstEnergy dba W.H. Sammis Power Plant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mullis v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03476
Plaintiff:
Sammy Mullis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dye-Sharpe et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04510
Plaintiff:
Cornelia Dye-Sharpe and Sammy Sharpe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sammy et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03864
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sammy and Geraldine Sammy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmon v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02994
Plaintiff:
Sammy Harmon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryson v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02739
Plaintiff:
Sammy Bryson
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
