Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kafi v. Sand Canyon Corporation F/K/A Option One Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kafi and Kafi, Inc.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee for ABFC 2006-OPT3 Trust, Sand Canyon Corporation F/K/A Option One Mortgage Corporation, PHH Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schronk et al v. Sand Canyon Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Sand Canyon Corporation FKA Option One Mortgage Corporation, PHH Mortgage Company, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Schronk and Pulse Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerner v. American Home Mortgage Servicing et al
as 4:2015cv03750
Plaintiff:
Caridad Kerner
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing , American Home Mortgage Corp., Sand Canyon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2014cv01488
Plaintiff:
David R. Spencer and Faye L. Spencer
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Sand Canyon Corporation F/K/A Option One Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pullis v. Sand Canyon Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00892
Defendant:
David Ackel, American Homes 4 Rent Properties Two, LLC, Barry & Sewart and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Pullis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Onstot et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
D. D. Onstot and T. B. Onstot
Defendant:
Sand Canyon Corporation, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, PC and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gonzalez v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01708
Plaintiff:
Herlindo Gonzalez
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. , Wells Fargo Bank NA and Sand Canyon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
