Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
USA v. MI
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor: BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS and others
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Not Yet Classified: COALITION TO PROTECT MICHIGAN RESOURCES, fka Michigan Fisheries Resources Conservation Coalition
USA v. MI
as 23-1944
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor / Appellee: BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS and others
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Amicus Curiae: COALITION TO PROTECT MICHIGAN RESOURCES, fka Michigan Fisheries Resources Conservation Coalition
USA v. MI
as 23-1931
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor / Appellee: BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS, LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANS and others
Intervenor: SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 23-5076
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan, MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C. and others
USA v. MI
as 23-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor / Appellee: BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS and others
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Intervenor: DARRIN LAPINE
USA v. MI
as 22-1946
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor / Appellee: BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY, SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS, GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS and others
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF MICHIGAN, and its agents
Intervenor: COALITION TO PROTECT MICHIGAN RESOURCES, fka Michigan Fisheries Resources Conversation Coalition
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01399
Plaintiff: Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians et al v. McKinsey & Company Inc.
as 3:2021cv08631
Plaintiff: Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians and Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MN Dept. of Natural Resources, et al v. White Earth Band of Ojibwe, et al
as 21-3050
Plaintiff / Appellant: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Sarah Strommen, Commissioner, Barb Naramore, Deputy Commissioner and others
Defendant / Appellee: The White Earth Band of Ojibwe and Hon. David A. DeGroat, in his official capacity as judge of the White Earth Band of Ojibwe Tribal Court
Not Yet Classified: Bay Mills Indian Community, Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of null, Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewas and others
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chip v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-5125
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of the Interior and David Longly Bernhardt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, Detroit Entertainment, LLC and Greektown Casino, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?