Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Diversey Inc
as 2:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Defendant:
Diversey Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Henkel Corporation
as 2:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Henkel Corporation
Plaintiff:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Karul v. SC Johnson & Son Inc Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 2:2013cv00900
Plaintiff:
Virginia Karul
Defendant:
SC Johnson & Son Inc Long Term Disability Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Nutraceutical Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00861
Plaintiff:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Defendant:
Nutraceutical Corporation and NutraMarks Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Transport Corporation of America Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Defendant:
Transport Corporation of America Inc, Stevens Transport Inc, Far Side Trucking Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DeGuelle v. Camilli et al
as 2:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael J DeGuelle and Michael J DeGuelle
Defendant:
Kristin J Camilli, Mark H Eckhardt, Gayle P Kosterman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The Clorox Company v. SC Johnson & Son Inc
as 2:2009cv00408
Plaintiff:
The Clorox Company, The Clorox Company, The Clorox Company and others
Defendant:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Thompson et al v. Retirement Plan for Employees of SC Johnson & Sons Inc
as 2:2007cv01047
Plaintiff:
Michael J Thompson, David A Troestler and James Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
Retirement Plan for Employees of SC Johnson & Sons Inc, Retirement Plan for Employees of JohnsonDiversey Inc and Retirement Plan for Employees of JohnsonDiversey Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
