Cases 31 - 40 of 43
FELKER et al v. USW LOCAL 10-901 et al
as 2:2013cv07101
Plaintiff:
PAUL L. FELKER , WILLIAM SCHRADER , MICHAEL MCCORMICK and others
Defendant:
USW LOCAL 10-901, USW LOCAL 10-901 (SU) and USW LOCAL 10-901 (NE) MARCUS HOOK REFINERY WORKERS INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schrader v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00902
Plaintiff:
Adam J Schrader
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SCHRADER ET AL V ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv66166
Plaintiff:
MARY E SCHRADER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHRADER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56701
Plaintiff:
GERWIN W. SCHRADER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCHRADER et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81537
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. SCHRADER and DELORES I. SCHRADER
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHRADER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72530
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. SCHRADER
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHRADER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86020
Plaintiff:
BOBBY G. SCHRADER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ayers v. Bradford County et al
as 1:2008cv01148
Plaintiff:
Clinton Ayers
Defendant:
Bradford County, Nancy Schrader, Bradford County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SCHRADER v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77405
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SCHRADER
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
