Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Guskind v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv04977
Plaintiff:
Scott E. Guskind
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Guskind v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv06289
Plaintiff:
Scott E. Guskind
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury - Jones Act
Garson et al v. Caldwell Marine International, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv05351
Plaintiff:
Scott Garson and Karen Garson
Cross Defendant:
Caldwell Marine International, LLC and CABLE BARGE
Cross Claimant:
Atlantic Coast Tug and Marine, LLC
Defendant:
Tug Fort Point
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Bolmeier v. BillyBey Ferry Company, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01852
Defendant:
John Axel Forsman III and BillyBey Ferry Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Scott Bolmeier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bolmeier v. New York Waterway/East River Ferry
as 1:2018cv05488
Defendant:
New York Waterway/East River Ferry
Plaintiff:
Scott Bolmeier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Witkowski, et al v. Niagara Jet Adventures, LLC
as 1:2016cv00856
Plaintiff:
Sarah Witkowski and Scott Witkowski
Defendant:
Niagara Jet Adventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Qais Ahmed v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv07267
Plaintiff:
Qais Ahmed
Defendant:
Scott Moser, Sealift Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Stegen v. City of New York
as 1:2012cv04879
Defendant:
City of New York
Plaintiff:
Scott Stegen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: City of New York
as 12-885
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Not Yet Classified:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
3Rd Party Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Defendant:
Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Appellee:
Paul Flecker, Torgan & Cooper, P.C., Daniel Ennis and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
In Re: City of New York
as 12-885
Plaintiff:
Saul Bienenfeld, Estate of Bagarozza
Respondent:
Carlos M. Calderon and Richard S. Weisman
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Public Administrator for the County of Queens as Administrator of the Estate of Guierllermo Paguay
Third-Party-Defendant:
The M/V Andrew Barberi, its engines and boilers in rem, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., John Doe, #6, AKA Deckhand Number 7 on the M/V Andrew Barberi, John Doe, #3, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194., AKA Deckhand Number 4 on the M/V Andrew Barberi and others
Claimant:
Theresa Klingele, Vito Oronzo Caputo, Reava Seymour and others
Defendant:
Jose Paguay and Richard Godosky, Attorney
Defendant - Appellee:
Kelly Garigliano, John Scott Thompson, Richard Smith, Detective, re: Third Party Claim of J. McMillan, Jr. v. Iris Weinshall. See doc # 194. and others
Appellee:
Paul Flecker and Torgan & Cooper, P.C.
Claimant - Appellee:
Philip Garigliano, Rasika Dias, Joan Thompson and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Dougherty, Ryan, Giuffra, Zambito & Hession
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Daniel Ennis and William Greenwood
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
