Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DIPPOLITO v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DO v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2011cv04201
Petitioner:
SY DO
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, J.L. NORWOOD and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PEREZ v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2009cv04532
Plaintiff:
MIKE PEREZ
Defendant:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, ABIGAIL LOPEZ, M.D. and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GEWIN v. DODRILL et al
as 3:2009cv03612
Petitioner:
BARRY WILLIAM GEWIN and SCOTT DODRILL
Respondent:
ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
CARTER v. SADOWSKI et al
as 1:2009cv02348
Plaintiff:
JESSE MCKINLEY CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
HENRY J. SADOWSKI, HARRELL WATTS, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARTIS v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2009cv00986
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH ARTIS
Defendant:
PAUL SCHULTZ, SCOTT DODRILL, H. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RICKS v. BYRNES et al
as 1:2009cv00473
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN RICKS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH BYRNES, SUSAN KIEFFER, JOHN FEHLNER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COUNCIL v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2009cv00429
Plaintiff:
HERBERT COUNCIL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., CLAUDE MAYE, ODEM and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
REEVES v. LAPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPIN, SCOTT DODRILL, GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv06131
Plaintiff:
MARTIN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
