Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
TTE Technology, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2012cv09497
Plaintiff:
TTE Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2012cv09251
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Fell v. Sears Roebuck and Co et al
as 1:2012cv01466
Plaintiff:
Bradley E Fell
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co, Kmart Corporation and Sears Holdings Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kinzie et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co et al
as 3:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Justin Kinzie and Eva Kinzie
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co , Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products NA Inc , Husqvarna Professional Outdoor Products Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balele, Pastori v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 3:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Pastori M. Balele
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pinpoint Incorporated v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 1:2012cv01195
Plaintiff:
Pinpoint Incorporated
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eye v. Sears Roebuck And Co.
as 1:2011cv04894
Plaintiff:
Marty L. Eye
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck And Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al v. Rockhard Laboratories, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02483
Plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and KCD IP, LLC
Defendant:
Rockhard Laboratories, LLC and Rockhard Laboratories Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
