Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Breakell v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Maremont Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Breakell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Monagas et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
as 3:2013cv00927
Plaintiff:
Liana Monagas and Noah Monagas
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. , Sears Roebuck & Co and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Klorczyk et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2013cv00257
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. , Shinn Fu Corporation and Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frederick Klorczyk, Jr. and Lynne Klorczyk
Thirdparty_defendant:
MVP (HK) Industries, LTD
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Queenie, LTD. v. Nygard International et al
as 3:2011mc00014
Plaintiff:
Queenie, LTD.
Defendant:
Nygard International , Sears Roebuck & Co and Mercantile Stores Co. Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Nygard International
Counter_defendant:
Queenie, LTD., Heavenly Fabrics, Inc., Marc Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Peterson v. MTD Prod Inc, et al
as 3:2009cv00644
Plaintiff:
Neal Peterson and Neal Peterson
Defendant:
MTD Prod Inc and Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Schneider et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co et al
as 3:2008cv01949
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Schneider and Peter Uhrynowski
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co, Deere & Co., Tecumseh Prod Co and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
