Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Morales Aparicio v. Muller
as 11-2316
Petitioner - Appellee:
William A. Morales Aparicio
Respondent:
Dominick Orsino, Colonel of Orange County Correctional Facility
Respondent - Appellant:
Wayne Muller, Assistant Field Office Director, Office of Detention and Removal for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William Joyce, Assistant Field Office Director, Office of Detention and Removal for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Christopher Shanahan, New York Field Office Director for the Office of Detention and Removal for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Bazuaye v. Napolitano
as 10-3956
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jeromi Bazuaye
Respondent - Appellee:
Janet Napolitano, in her official capacity, Department of Homeland Security, Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, John Morton, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Abassi v. Secretary, Department of Homel
as 10-440
Petitioner - Appellant:
Fahim Abassi
Respondent - Appellee:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, District Director United States Customs & Immigration Enforcement and Field Office Director, New York
Abassi v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2009cv07605
Petitioner:
Fahim Abassi
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, District Director U.S. Customs & Immigration Enforcement, NY, NY and Field Office Director, NY, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05172
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
